David Megginson wrote:
Thanks -- that did the trick. The plane is actually flying well, and I'm starting to feel tempted to go back and do more work to make it a fully-usable alternative to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@#na 172 -- after all, it would be nice for users to be able to fly a light single with the wings in the right place, for a change.

I wonder if we can model the broken air vent door on the pilot's side that blows -35 degC air on my feet when I'm flying in the winter.

Just come fly in my basement. I'll unhook the dryer vent for you. A few more updates to your piper would be cool. There are a couple missing details from the default C172 also such as mixture knob.


I think I might be starting to get itchy to do a new release one of these days ....

Curt.
--
Curtis Olson   Intelligent Vehicles Lab         FlightGear Project
Twin Cities    [EMAIL PROTECTED]                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota      http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org


_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to