> > Are there any good reasons NOT to do this? > No, I don't think so. > > Do you plan to *move* all JSBSim aircraft out of flightgear onto > the JSBSim > web page, or would you just maintain them as a whole in JSBSim like the > aerodynamic tables are maintained now?
> Mathias It wouldn't be a requirement - to store JSBSim aircraft at the JSBSim web site - I'm not even sure it would really need to be in CVS (I hadn't thought of that part, yet). But, it just seems to make sense that there ought to be a central repository for JSBSim aircraft (and where better than the JSBSim site?), and installation ought to be very simple. It is also envisioned the site/page would provide information on using the aircraft, and perhaps other useful stuff, as well. Dave Culp raised this idea the other day - he already has a "hangar" here: http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/hangar/hangar.html I don't want to interfere with the FlightGear base directory storage, however, there appears to be coming a time when maybe the base package needs to be culled of some aircraft models - at least eventually the number of aircraft modeled will become so large that it's just not feasible or desirable to hold all of them in the base package. I think the hangar approach is a good one. Jon _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
