On Dienstag, 23. M�rz 2004 11:34, Jon Berndt wrote:
> It wouldn't be a requirement - to store JSBSim aircraft at the JSBSim web
> site - I'm not even sure it would really need to be in CVS (I hadn't
> thought of that part, yet). But, it just seems to make sense that there
> ought to be a central repository for JSBSim aircraft (and where better than
> the JSBSim site?), and installation ought to be very simple. It is also
> envisioned the site/page would provide information on using the aircraft,
> and perhaps other useful stuff, as well. Dave Culp raised this idea the
> other day - he already has a "hangar" here:
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/hangar/hangar.html
>
> I don't want to interfere with the FlightGear base directory storage,
> however, there appears to be coming a time when maybe the base package
> needs to be culled of some aircraft models - at least eventually the number
> of aircraft modeled will become so large that it's just not feasible or
> desirable to hold all of them in the base package. I think the hangar
> approach is a good one.
I was just asking.
I am looking forward to a new hangar tab on the JSBSim web page. ;-)
And I might have a candidate for this in the near future ...
Models in cvs will be a good idea I think. The are partialy already in JSBSims
CVS. At least the aerodynamic tables and the engines are there. Maintaining
an aircraft as a whole on one cvs server is better than spreading parts of
the configuration over several cvs servers. If we do so, we might think about
our current JSBSim directory structure a bit, but that's OT here.
Greetings
Mathias
--
Mathias Fr�hlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
