Vivian Meazza said: > > > Curtis L. Olson asked > > > Sent: 24 March 2004 15:36 > > To: FlightGear developers discussions > > Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Official 0.9.4 release??? > > > > > > I'm seeing a last minute flurry of people trying to get final model > > tweaks into the base package (which is good--great work > > guys![1]), but > > haven't heard any other complaints about the pre2 release. Are we > > getting pretty close to making this release official so we can get on > > with other stuff? > > > > I've got the Seahawk model with a 2d panel working (and I could give it to > you now), but on inspection, I don't think it is quite good enough to go > into a base package. Lee felt that the 3d panel model should replace it. I > am minded to leave it for now and move on to the promised Spitfire. I can > return to it for the next release, if we think that 2d panels are worth > pursuing. >
In general, I'd say they are not worth it. Also before submitting a second xml wrapper, take a look at the p51d, and others to see how to combine 2d and 3d into the same file. There is no need for two separate files. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
