On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:39:24 +0200, Jorge Van Hemelryck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:11:27 +0100 >Jonathan Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> >> Yesterday, you wrote '... we can't distribute >> ... even the symbol definitions' which I find intriguing; when I last had >> access to information in this area, the symbology was the subject of >> unclassified NATO definitions. Have you got a foo fighter underground >> somewhere? > >Now that would be nice... Actually, our symbology is probably >non-standard. However, I've tried to search the internet for >"MIL-STD-1787A" (or B or C or D), which is a document mentioned >(incorrectly as MIL-STD-1797A) in FlightGear's README.xmlhud and the >document itself does not seem to have been published on the internet. >Maybe you have to buy it ? Or can we request it from an official source ? <snip> This is the place to get US mil-std documents standards online: http://www.dsp.dla.mil/ However it appears that some of the symbology (at least the new, updated bits) is in some way sensitive: http://assist.daps.dla.mil/eAccess/index.cfm?ident_number=37143 Funny old world :) For various reasons you are unlikely to find the equivalent NATO publication (one of the STANAGs) online. Rick -- Help the Waterway Recovery Group to help restore the Uks canal network Make a donation to the 'Right Tool' Appeal http://www.wrg.org.uk/cgi-bin/fmaker.pl?appeal.htm _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
