Alex Romosan wrote: > Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Andy Ross wrote: > >> Erik Hofman wrote: > >> > >>>Since FlightGear is linked to libGL at link time, the number of > >>>dlclose calls would always be one less than the number of dlopen > >>>calls. > >> In which case the dlclose() is 100% guaranteed to be a noop anyway > >> and > >> can be safely removed. :) > >> Seriously: consider the case where this symbol came out of a library > >> that we *don't* link to statically. > > > > Why would I? > > > >> Then this would undeniably be a > >> bug, because the library would be unmapped before the function could > >> be called. Honestly, this code is just wrong. > > > > No it's not. I can't see a case where a program that relies so heavily > > on OpenGL wouldn't link to the GL library at link time. > > you are mixing static and dynamic linking. andy is talking about > dynamic linking. i am not sure what you are talking about.
Anyway, a fix is in CVS now -Fred _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
