I was talking about having a libary-like interface that can allow the user to
implement basic and advanced animations really easily.
On August 7, 2004 05:08 am, Boris Koenig wrote:
> So, you are also talking of script-able ways to implement basic
> animations or what exactly is it that you're talking about ?
> I would agree that pretty much most more advanced avionics could
> be easily implemented if there was some basic support to animate
Flightgear-devel mailing list