On Friday 21 January 2005 18:44, David Luff wrote: > On 21/01/2005 at 18:38 Durk Talsma wrote:
> > > >Any thoughts? > > Yes, I'm still inclined to go this way (integration), but haven't had the > chance to dig into the AIModel code yet. The comments above were intended > to be somewhat generic, to be implemented in whatever method/branch I wind > up using. I guess I can comment more inteligently on this without the risk > of suggesting stuff that already exists once I've had a good dig into the > AIModel code, so I'll go and take a look... > > Cheers - Dave > I understand, it usually takes quite a bit of time to understand somebody else's code. I'm actually fairly fluent in understanding the most relevant parts of Dave's code (i.e. FGAIAircraft and FGAIFlightPlan classes). So time permitting I wouldn't mind having a stab at porting (some of) your code to interact with the AIModel system, it that is okay with you. As I mentioned yesterday, the taxiway code comes to mind. This approach might actually be mutually benificial, if this would free up some time for you to work on taxidraw. Eventually, we need data for the AI system, such as, taxiways and parkings/gates and taxidraw would be an ideal tool for that. Let me know what you think. Cheers, Durk _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
