Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Quoting Geoff Air:

>> It certainly paves the way for fgrun to simply write the
>> system.fgfsrc, and run the binary with a minimum of command
>> line parameters ... and leaves a persistent file 'trace'
>> of what fgrun 'requested' of FG ... more info benefit ...
> Because some argued, and I mostly agree, that fgrun shouldn't overwrite user's
> preferences, command line options are now used.

Nevertheless the proposed make much sense for those who don't use
FGrun but configure FlightGear using the system.fgfsrc instead.

Thanks, Geoff,
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !

Flightgear-devel mailing list

Reply via email to