On Wed, 11 May 2005 16:49:19 +0100, David wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 11/05/2005 at 09:50 Dave Culp wrote: > > > > "disused" airfields, > > > > OK, this would then not be the same as an airport that no longer > > exists? I would think some people would have a problem with having > > these added to the > > scenery. > > Airfields which still exist but are now disused can be submitted to > Robin - there's some of those already. OTOH I'm not sure if TerraGear > currently builds them or not. Airfields that don't physically exist > anymore might be more problematic - I don't think he'd want to include > those! It's not *that* hard to rebuild a few tiles of custom scenery > oneself though. ..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers, "axe'em down on 9/11/2001." -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
