Vivian Meazza wrote: > I like it very much indeed. Will it work in practice? Testing and > tuning will take some time as I don't have any exact data. Probably > into next week.
I suspect it should work fine. The real device would have been an analog computer hooked to a (presumably) slow motor, so the 10 Hz update rate shouldn't be too much of an issue. You could get fancy and use the interpolate() code to make it slew smoothly rather than jumping to the new value instantly. Note that there are at least a few bugs in the sample code: it needs to clamp to the range [-1:0] and then multiply by AUTHORITY, rather than generating the normalized value and then clamping to authority; it doesn't handle the cutout control, the tunables should probably be properties instead of hardcoded numbers, should have a failsafe case for an uninitialized FDM, etc... Andy _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
