* Frederic Bouvier -- Thursday 30 June 2005 16:05: > Melchior FRANZ a écrit : > I am sorry about that, and please accept my apologies. I didn't get into > the issue until you change the API, and I only understood you didn't get > the idea until your last message.
Heh ... and I apologize to all for the false alarm and the needless inconvenience, especially to Erik for dragging him into that and (successfully :-) fooling him. I've learned a lot about the property system now, maybe it'll at least pay in the future. But reverting doesn't solve all problems (although I could again be wrong): alias() and unalias() referenced pointers *without* increasing/decreasing the refcounter. So they could lose their target and crash. I simply let them call incrementRef/decrementRef on their target. This should then be done with SGPropertyNode_ptr, too, right? And a removeChildren() (derived from the old removeChild(), not a "clever" new design based on wrong assumptions :-) would also be handy. And all callers of removeChild() should set "keep" to false. Only one did so far. Mine didn't, because the documentation left me quite unclear about why I would or would not want that. m. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
