Martin Spott wrote:
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
[...] However, it has only very basic out the window graphics. I'm
doing a (hopefully quick little) project to build an interface from
their software to FlightGear in order to use FlightGear as the visuals.
Indeed this sounds interesting. Does it mean that FG will get a modern,
full-featured and stable interface for external FDM's ?
Sounds like you probably have something more specific in mind than can be
expressed in a single sentence. The particular adjectives you've chosen could
be loaded with additional meaning (or not.) :-) I'm not aware of any industry
standards that coule be targeted, even if we wanted to target something. From
what I've seen, this stuff is very project (and aircraft) specific.
As with any feature request, you are welcome to code something up yourself if
the collective group isn't moving fast enough for you. :-)
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson http://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
