Jon Stockill wrote:
> http://flightgear.stockill.org.uk/scenery/osmroads1.jpg
> http://flightgear.stockill.org.uk/scenery/osmroads2.jpg
Herewith I appoint you to the future maintainer of OSM-data in our
kindcover database :-)
Do they log the changes in their database, do they offer any 'raw'
interface ? This would make it easier for us to track the development
of their dataset. Do they differenciate between different sized roads ?
To be honest I don't expect importing a bulk of tiny roads into our
PostGIS-DB to be our primary goal. They are nice to have for those of
us who operate on powerful hardware but the small roads probably won't
make it into the default scenery. We should stuff everything into our
database that we are able to 'classify' in a reasonable way (small,
medium, large, ....) and let everyone decide which data (s)he wants to
use for his/her scenery.
I just read that the current release 0.7 of QGIS is able to render
directly into a PostGIS database - this might help a lot.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
