Hello Curt,
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> I'm not disagreeing with you, but would like to point out that there
> exists a perfect world with infinite time and infinite energy. But then
> there exists my world.
I definitely _do_ respect the particularities of your world - not only
because it resembles my world more than I dared to expect ....
I think you know that I didn't intend to attack anyone personally (not
even you ;-) - it's just that a huge bunch of goodwill alone in fact
doesn't change a situation.
Now, we have to face that there were several releases with
known/obvious bugs or 'misfeatures' and shipping known bugs is
dissatisfying not only for developers but also for those, who've been
pointing at these bugs but didn't get heard. So if there's no
opportunity to have a pre-release phase long enough to iron these out
then the FlightGear project should look for a different means of
'quality control'.
I'm clever enough to realize that my idea of quality control is not
necessary the best one for FG ;-)) I simply want to point out that
the project is very well advised to have better quality control than it
had for the past years. I have one or two ideas how this could be
achieved, I'm convinced that others have other and probably better
ideas and I'd like to see an open discussion on this.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
