On Friday 11 November 2005 18:40, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > As best as I can see from their site, they just interpolated through the > voids. That generally works fine and is pretty much what we did for the > current scenery, but when you are missing big chunks of things like the > grand canyon or tops of moutains, then what? For the USA where we have > an alternative data source, I filled in the voids from that data which > is good for things like the grand canyon and rhode island that are > missing huge chunk.
Isn't SRTM data version 2 allready corrected manually? That's what i thought, when i heard sth. about SRTM v2. Best Regards, Oliver C. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
