On Wednesday 30 November 2005 16:50, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Curtis L. Olson -- Wednesday 30 November 2005 15:19: > > You may want to attack this in small steps ... for instance start out > > with just getting save/load of aircraft position working. > > As demonstrated before [1], this is quite easy to do even > with Nasal[2]. The only thing that needs to be implemented in fgfs > is a way to tell it where to store the files. Something like > FG_HOME/--fg-home. Paul was already working on that for exactly > this purpose[3], but somehow he felt discouraged and stopped (IIRC). > > m. > > > [1] > http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-users/2005-November/012871. >html [2] http://members.aon.at/mfranz/flightgear/ac_state.nas > [3] > http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2004-December/032641. >html
From the thread : http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2004-December/032651.html Curt said it was something we should "discuss". So I laid out my ideas and the reasons for those ideas and that was the end of it. Zero feedback. :( I'm not the sort of person who persistently badgers someone to give me their input. If people aren't bothered to reply to my thoughts and ideas then I'm not going to be bothered to contribute any code. Someone else can do it now. :) And this whole "let's push 1.0 out" thing is annoying me too. It's like someone has a secret agenda for getting a 1.0 release out. We sit on a single version for nearly an entire year and then suddenly we have to push out two consecutive releases within a couple of months. There was *ZERO* discussion about the decision and now it seems everyone must halt their contributions and fix bugs instead? I don't mind leadership but I hate dictatorship. Paul _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
