Erik Hofman wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>> I'd like to underline these two points:
>> 1.) There won't be any volunteer who is serious about doing ATC
>> service as long as FlightGear does not have _appropriate_
>> capabilities. Appropriate capabilities in my eyes includes
>> something that resembles the functions of a radar screen plus ...
>
> Once the multiplayer code uses the AIModel code this would be easy.
As I understand the respective effort is already underway and simply
just needs more time - which I appreciate very much because I'm a big
fan of redundancy-avoidance :-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
