"Buchanan, Stuart" wrote: > I feel slightly wary of voice-based comms within FG itself, if only > because it is unlikely to be able to integrate within the current ATC/AI > code.
In other words (with a not that negative touch) this would say: We'd appreciate if ATC/AI developers would keep such a scenario in mind when they plan changes to this stuff. You can't doubt that voice ATC is reality, not only in real life but in desktop flight simulation as well. Why should FlightGear negate heading for this direction ? Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
