On Friday 17 November 2006 08:02, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..this case is well past "GPL Violation", and fraud. > http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Realistic-Professional-Aviation-Flight-Simulator_W0Q >QitemZ260053619883QQihZ016QQcategoryZ80336QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem states "New & > Unregistered 100% Legal, Not OEM, Not Trial" instead of "GPL". Further, > http://search.ebay.com.au/_W0QQsassZredlineditQQhtZ-1 lists 16 other > digital items, > http://pages.ebay.com.au/help/buy/contextual/digital-item.html
On Friday 17 November 2006 17:10, John Wojnaroski wrote: > Didier Fabert wrote: > >this page is very interesting > >http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html > > > >i understand that if we think there is a gpl violation, we must write to > > them at [EMAIL PROTECTED] they know if it's a violation or not ! > > > >regards > > True, but ultimately it becomes the obligation of the copyright holder > to take legal action, and only that individual or organization is > legally entitled to do that; i.e. Curt Olson or members who have > contributed to the project. > Hey, a random thought just struck me: Isn't it ironic that the person who's been ranting the most about GPL violations is actually be the person who shouldn't be worried the slightest bit about it (in terms of actual code / data contributions, or lack thereof...). Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
