Chris is right. It can only be good if images of flightgear sold any which way cause people to want the product itself.
Personally, since gpl allows even the sale of the software itself, I find it hard to believe a case can be made that images of the software in action can't be sold. Also people involved with flightgear have to realize the originally reason many of us proposed the linux type cooperative flightsim project that became flightgear was to provide some good alternatives to more restrictive software that existed at the time. Specifically people were worried then whether commercial owners of those products like microsoft would suddenly disallow addons etc. Therefore it would be ridiculous for flightgear suddenly to start being litigeous about people making derivative use of flightgear! On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 3:31 pm, Didier Fabert wrote: > Le samedi 18 novembre 2006 00:01, Curtis Olson a écrit : >> That's all well and good, except I think we want our screenshots to be >> redistributable and used and shared as much as possible. This is an >> open >> and free project. I really want to avoid going down the path of >> having to >> decide who can and can't use our screenshots and ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
