Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Hans Fugal -- Tuesday 24 July 2007: >> He didn't have an argument. He had a solution > > Yeah, but what annoys me is that it's a solution that is in fact about > turning fgfs into shared libs, but disguised as a solution for (allegedly) > "responsible" developers.
I do not want FG to go the shared lib route. I have shown that it works for me, but that is all. I want to suggest that one FG build tree should be able to build three statically linked executables. Sure, dynamic linking could save a few more MB, but the point here is saving developer time and hassle, and that can be achieved with static linking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
