Curtis Olson wrote: > I have no problem with people using libtool for genuine shared library > packages; it can make a lot of sense there. But for FlightGear/SimGear we > found that it ended up causing more headaches than it cured.
My proposal is NOT to switch FG to use libtool. My proposal is to allow building statically linked executables as FG is doing not, but build up three different executables in the same one build tree. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
