On Friday 14 September 2007 00:41, leee wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2007 15:27, Forums Virgin Net wrote:
> > Hi,
> >     Just some Information about part 3 of the Movie, The new concorde
> > Build still has some issues such as the Vertical Speed does not work it
> > still latches to full + (Plus) pitch rate or full - (Minus) Pitch rate
> > which cause's concorde to lose control, this is a big problem when
> > activating Altitude Acquire because VS is activated automatically by this
> > control. I do plan on including the new concorde in my Movie I have some
> > idea's to include it on an oposite flight track to that of the Russian
> > who has recieved orders from his C.O. and is in-bound into USA airspace,
> > I plan a Near miss at some point but implementing this will be a bit of a
> > challenge.
> >
> > I am about to begin shooting this shortly, if anyone wants to take part
> > by flying the SU-37 to simulate a near miss at an Altitude around 51,200
> > Feet please let me know, it does seem theoretically possible due to the
> > max cieling of the SU-37 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-37
> >
> > Robin S. - I got your earlier email, but have not been able to reply due
> > to email loops back on myself ? Please contact me via my Form as I think
> > email address gets cropped in here?
> > http://freespace.virgin.net/mike.perla/feedbackform.html
> > Please be sure to leave your email address at the bottom of the form :o)
> > Thanks for your offer to help!
> >
> > It seems the Infra Red device in the SU-37 does not function but some
> > special FX here would not go amiss if at all possible? The SU-37 Pilot
> > may mistake a reading here as an anomoly as the Concorde is a rare bird
> > and has a low Radar Cross Section from the front view. The near miss is
> > part of a comic sequence I have planned for events in the concorde
> > cockpit.
> >
> > Anyway I plan to do some Video shoots in a day or so, perhaps the
> > weekend.
> >
> > All the Best Aerotro
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Online FlightGear Simulator Tracker Page.
> > http://mpserver04.flightgear.org
> > http://www.flightgear.org
>
> Hi Aerotro,
>
> I can't guarantee that the SU-37 will get to 51k+ ft.
>
> Because YASim doesn't do super-sonic (not a critism) I had to guesstimate a
> suitable sub-sonic datum i.e. less than max trust @ less than max alt, but
> the sub-sonic characteristics seem to be in the right ball-park.
>
> I was more interested in 'playing' with YASim's out of the envelope
> qualities (which I was very pleased with) rather than making an easily
> flyable aircraft, so flying it on the stick could be tricky:)  That's also
> why there isn't much of a panel or authentic instruments - it's not what I
> was interested in but it's there for anyone else to take further:)
>
> I can't remember if the thrust vectoring feature is on or off, by default,
> but I found that it had negligible effect at low power settings (which was
> interesting;)
>
> If you're planning to hand fly it, as opposed to scripting something, I'd
> recommend using either the 'cubed' stick function (cubes the 0.0-1.0 input
> before applying it to the control surfaces - sensitivity is very low at
> small inputs but increases at a cube rate as the input increases - heh heh)
> or using the stick roll-hold and either the stick pitch-hold or
> climb-rate-hold functions to help make it a bit more controlable.  Using
> the roll&pitch/climb modes should level out the a/c if you let go of the
> stick...
>
> ...unless you're out of control:)
>
> There is a primitive spin/ooe recovery function too, but it really needs
> about 10k ft to be safe (may need a few attempts)
>
> When I last flew it I found that I needed to manually reset the autopilot,
> via the menu, before all the various A/P controllers would work so you
> should do this before you try to take off:)
>
> hth
>
> LeeE
>
Oh yeah - the A/P controllers were tuned to my system (Athlon XP 1900+ & 
Nvidia 6600) which worked out to between 8-25 fps and I'm afraid they are 
dependent on the frame-rate and they may not work well on higher performance 
systems. I've seen them go either way when I've checked out some of the 
different a/c A/Ps I've done on different systems:(

LeeE


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to