On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gh.robin wrote: >As far i understand the "<type>carrier</type>" was developed to answer to >landing and taking off on/from carrier but any model which is defined ><type>carrier</type> can have the same features or less (no catapult, no >wire, no speed) , like your oil platform AND only available with non >flying model.
Would it make sense to create/define a generic "heliport" type? It could be used for the oil platform or the top of a building or ... -- Mike Schuh - Seattle, Washington USA http://www.farmdale.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
