On sam 13 octobre 2007, you wrote: > On sam 13 octobre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > * Tim Moore -- Saturday 13 October 2007: > > > If I had received only objections, I wouldn't have checked it in. > > > > I and AJ objected. Andy suggested an alternative (trying .osg and > > .ac on objects with no explicit extension), which I don't exactly > > consider an agreement. Nobody agreed, but Vivian and Jon tested > > your patch. Jon reported no speed improvement. (This is not from > > memory, but from the IRC log.) > > > > It's not that I can't deal with getting overruled. But it's IMHO > > not acceptable to ignore all objections. The way to go would > > have been to discuss the problem again here on the list, *before* > > just committing. Either it can be resolved, or better solutions > > are found. And if nobody cares to comment, you can still set a > > deadline of a few days after which you would commit. > > > > m. > ouups sorry an error NOT is missing
In any case pointing to .osg instead of .ac must NOT be a rule, the designer/developer could want to manage the model with a different process (animations , offsets, ......) according to the file format. Cheers -- Gérard http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
