On Thursday 22 November 2007 13:52, John Denker wrote:
Sorry - couldn't resist this But... <explicit-just-for-a-laugh><prompt> > If you think you've got problems when the heading angle goes to 180 > degrees, think about what happens when the pitch angle goes to ±90 > degrees. </prompt><response> Been there - done that. But seriously, I have done some stuff in that specific area - control when pitch and roll reverse. Haven't released anything yet (mostly related to the SU-37 and YF-23), of course, because it didn't work all the time:) </response></explicit-just-for-a-laugh> I've read through all the responses on this subject, so far, and in some ways it seems as though it's being over-complicated. I don't think that there is a bug in either YASim or JSBSim in relation to this issue - the data is already being passed to the old original hard-coded hud. This means that the data is already being produced and it is not an FDM issue about producing the data but about how the data already being successfully produced is being handled and routed, and eventually being exposed in the property-tree. Oh yeah - and what it's going to be called ;-) LeeE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
