On Saturday 01 December 2007 02:38:13 pm alexis bory wrote:
> Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > But we havn't found a number yet- so how should we find the right
> > name?
>
>
> Alexis
Identifying the versions as stable testing and unstable might not be a bad
idea. It tells people that active development is going on and there are new
releases planned. eg...
Flightgear Current Stable Version 0.9.10 Wright
Testing 1.0 Lindenburg
Unstable v1.5-osg Simstick
I have not thought much about the names but I have thought about some easy to
understand scheme to show that future versions are being worked on. It
would be easier than writing a current news letter (hmmm.....)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
