-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Robert Black schrieb: > On Saturday 01 December 2007 02:38:13 pm alexis bory wrote: >> Heiko Schulz wrote: >>> But we havn't found a number yet- so how should we find the right >>> name? >> >> Alexis > > Identifying the versions as stable testing and unstable might not be a bad > idea. It tells people that active development is going on and there are new > releases planned. eg... > Flightgear Current Stable Version 0.9.10 Wright > Testing 1.0 Lindenburg > Unstable v1.5-osg Simstick
As I wrote before I doubt that that will work for FGFS. Currently we've got a stable branch (even numbers at the second position) and a development branch (odd numbers at the sechon position). But all we do happens in the development brach and nothing gets backported to the stable branch. I'm for dropping this scheme and only release current versions. BTW, even the linux kernel developing process dropped that scheme - and *they* are realy depending on showing the customers (aka users) if they are working with stable or unstable code... A crashing FGFS is annoying, a crashing kernel can be desasterous... CU, Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUtqmoWM1JLkHou0RCCM8AJ9zr/e8RSUV2hlwChn88/zHHiBvvQCfceWw 26zRmzlAFEZIW3qMcmrsc2w= =sMcf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
