> Yes, the selection should be "balanced". A representative of > every class that the users would be interested in, especially > well done ones (with 3D cockpit) that don't consume excessive > disk space, but more importantly: download volume. And they > should be flyable, too. > > I couldn't care less which FDMs they use. I'd have no problem > if they'd all be JSBSim or all YASim. The receivers probably > give a damn about the FDM. The selection is for them, not for > us. And if tried to be balanced, then what about UIUC and > LaRCSim? > > Yes, the f16 is broken. I just tried it. After a few minutes > you see how the FCS is starting to misbehave. The f16 starts > pulling to the right and up, etc. That's most noticeable after > you had it parked for some minutes. It can become completely > unflyable. I don't see use ship a broken aircraft that the > authors didn't care to fix despite several bug reports. But > well, I don't decide that anyway. > > m.
Melchior, I agree with you. If the F16 is broken now it should not be included. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
