On ven 7 décembre 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > --- Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > * Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 07 December 2007: > > > - avoiding really difficult to fly aircraft in the default aircraft > > > collection doesn't make fgfs a toy, and > > > > Oh, and to take some pressure from the bf109, I declare now the > > "pittss1c" the official victim that I'll pick on. That one should > > definitely not be part of the default aircraft selection. :-P > > > > m. > > That's quite OK. > > I was originally hoping that the Pitts would be a nice way to transition > from the very easy j3cub to the powerful warbirds, but it turned out to be > quite handful itself! > > We have a very nice progression from nose-wheel aircraft to twins for > complex/IFR operations: > > c172p/pa29-161 -> c182rg/pa24-250 -> Seneca-II > > However, I don't think we currently have a real equivalent path for > taildraggers in terms of handling. > > The closest I can think of is: > > j3cub -> dhc2W -> pittss1c/p51d/bf109/.... > > However, there is a big jump in challenge from the Beaver to the warbirds. > > Anyone know a good half-way house taildragger ? > > -Stuart > -Stuart Yes i will have that one, i got training on the real one when i was young ( so many years ago). http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/StampeSV4.jpg
Unfortunately it will not be available before FG stable will be released :( -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ << Less i work, better i go >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
