--- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 07 December 2007:
> > - avoiding really difficult to fly aircraft in the default aircraft
> > collection doesn't make fgfs a toy, and
>
> Oh, and to take some pressure from the bf109, I declare now the
> "pittss1c" the official victim that I'll pick on. That one should
> definitely not be part of the default aircraft selection. :-P
>
> m.
That's quite OK.
I was originally hoping that the Pitts would be a nice way to transition from
the
very easy j3cub to the powerful warbirds, but it turned out to be quite handful
itself!
We have a very nice progression from nose-wheel aircraft to twins for
complex/IFR
operations:
c172p/pa29-161 -> c182rg/pa24-250 -> Seneca-II
However, I don't think we currently have a real equivalent path for taildraggers
in terms of handling.
The closest I can think of is:
j3cub -> dhc2W -> pittss1c/p51d/bf109/....
However, there is a big jump in challenge from the Beaver to the warbirds.
Anyone know a good half-way house taildragger ?
-Stuart
-Stuart
-Stuart
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
