On mar 11 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Tuesday 11 December 2007:
> > As it looks right now, either tonight, or Thursday evening will
> > be my two windows of opportunity this week.
>
> I would rather go for Thursday, then. It's only known for a short
> time which aircraft are planned to go in, and even today and yesterday
> there were commits made to them. I could imagine that some want to
> make some last fixes and improvements. A release number of 1.0
> may not mean much to some people here, but it *does* mean something
> for a lot of the people out there, and I expect a lot more attention
> to a FlightGear v1.0 release than to a 0.9.11 one. We might get more
> reviews in more important places, and it can't hurt to polish some
> more. (And I committed a code change yesterday that could still
> turn out to have broken something. It would be a disaster if we had
> to release 1.1 a week after 1.0.  :-)
>
> m.
>

Why don't we give us the End of that Year to test fully the release ?
That period being more relax.
Won't it be a nice new  Gift to have a perfect   FlightGear 1.0  by the next 
year ?

Cheers

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
<< Less i work, better i go >>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to