Hi Dave, same here. But it is ok, if I start with 4:3 window and maximize it when fg runs (my normal start procedure).
Maik dave perry schrieb am 06.01.2008 05:08: > Maik Justus wrote: > >> Hi, >> Maik Justus schrieb am 26.12.2007 20:38: >> >>> Hi Syd, >>> >>> what's about an algorithm, which checks the ratio of the screen and >>> sets fow to 55 for 4:3 screens and 70 for 16:9 screens? (55 / 70 = >>> (4/3) / (16/9) ) >>> >>> Maik >>> P.S.: >>> for non-physicists: >>> (55 / 73,33333333333333333333333333333333333 = (4/3) / (16/9) ) >>> >>> >>> >> Meanwhile I have a new computer wit 16:9 screen and the same problem. >> I've modified the calculation in viewer.cxx as mentioned above. Syd, >> please check, if this would work for you. Then we can think about, how >> to implement that in a clean way (maybe we need an FG_SCALING_HEIGHT >> case?). The patch is for the osg-branch, but it works with the plib >> branch, too (maybe some lines offset). >> >> > Hi Maik, > > I have had a 16:9 flat pannel for some time. For the first time in > several months, I built fgfs for osg from fresh svn and fresh cvs. What > I noticed right away that has changed is that osg fgfs does not handle the > --geometry=1680x1050 > correctly anymore. The height of the image is too small for the width. > The gages are not round. The plib branch still handles this correctly. > Are you seeing what I am seeing or have I missed a patch? > > When I adjusted the width of the window until round objects are round > and then measure the aspect ratio of the adjusted window, the aspect > ratio is 4/3. > > Here is what comparing the plib to the osg response to changing the value of > /sim/current-view/aspect-ratio-multiplier tells me: > > In plib, it adjusts the displayed aspect ratio. I can get the same > distortion in plib fgfs as in osg fgfs by changing this value to ~1.2 > instead of 1. But if I try to "fix" the view in osg fgfs by adjusting > this value from 1 to 0.83333333, all it does is scale the distorted > image. i.e. it is adjusting the effective fov, not the aspect ratio. > > - Dave Perry > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel