Martin Spott wrote: > The FlightGear project has been notoriously behind about getting > people's source code contributions into CVS - for years. We all know > the story, it's been the same for years already, no need to repeat it > here. > > So, in order not to loose the respective contributions over the time, > such a GIT repo - be it mine or someone else's - makes the perfect tool > that allows contributors to maintain their changes in a local branch > while still easily keeping them in sync with the main source tree(s). > Thus, it will be highly beneficial for the FlightGear project as a > whole to support these developers by backing an official GIT repo > instead of letting their enthusiasm fade out in disappointment .... > > Guess why there are there so many private GIT repositories containing > modified versions of FlightGear source trees !? Please think of it and > keep up with the times. >
Ah, great to hear this from you, Martin. This does BTW not only apply to the FG source code, but also to the scenery and flightplans... ;-) Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
