Martin Spott wrote:
> John Denker wrote:
>> On 08/20/2008 02:32 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> 
>>> Perhaps I misunderstand the scope and capabilities of git ....
> 
>>> And at the end of the day, no matter what source code version control system
>>> we use, and no matter what useful tools it provides for branching and
>>> merging, we still need a human in the loop to act as a sanity check to
>>> evaluate and approve changes that go into the master repository. (I
>>> understand this is a philosophical choice on my part.  Another approach
>>> would be to let any and all changes from just about anyone to be committed
>>> to the master repository and let the review step happen when things break or
>>> crash or stop functioning optimally ... I just do not like that particular
>>> approach.)
> 
>> Why are we even discussing such wildly unprofessional approaches?
> 
> Nobody does, I guess. Curt just seems to be a bit desperate about
Some projects do support a "mob" branch in git where anyone can commit 
anything. 
Hell, why not? :)

> defending his refusal of an 'official' GIT mirror here. Maybe he simply
> ran out of arguments, so he finally decided to draw a black-and-white
> picture and sort of imply that those, who don't share his (Curt's)
> view, would be in favour of what we all consider to be the worst case.
> In fact, the scenario that Curt is describing here has nothing to do
> with the facual topic of the whole discussion.
> Personally I count the cited paragraph as a regrettable mistake.

In fairness Linus does talk up git's extreme support for forking, and there are 
many Linux trees to choose from; the reality is that you know where to go for 
something reliable.

Tim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to