On 20 Oct 2008, at 10:18, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > AFAIK that's not an option ATM. osgWidget is very new and was > committed only a few weeks ago. It still only offers basic > widgets, like plain buttons, text, menu, (tabbed) dialogs. > Buttons are only colored rectangles, with no "3D" appearance > etc. I haven't seen anything "advanced" like comboboxes, list > widgets, checkboxes etc. I think it will take another few > months until we can seriously consider switching. But then a > migration might not even be that much work.
I knew it was 'new', didn't realise it was quite that basic. Definitely best to wait until it matures some more. As you say, once it provides all (or nearly all) of the required widgets then hopefully migration will not be too difficult. I also realised there are probably some other pieces of the code that still rely on sg or ssg types or functions, I guess Tim has more of an idea what those might be. James ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
