Did I say I'd shut up now? Bah ... ;-) * Erik Hofman -- Friday 24 October 2008: > I never said I wanted to put my own implementation into > FlightGear. Still, there is a new option available soon.
True, I'm sorry. The ultimate question is really only: can we drop our current workarounds for buggy implementations, and rely on a clean & spec-compliant (i.e. working) OpenAL version, and point people to an URL where this can be found for optimal results. Ideally, this shouldn't be an ancient and unmaintained implementation. m. BTW: regarding this: * Erik Hofman -- Friday 24 October 2008: * * Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 24 October 2008: > > (b) "official" OpenAL by Creative (continued from (a)). Development > > stalled, not very actively maintained; last commits in May? > > Broken Doppler on Windows? Most people used to be using > > this until not too long ago. > Actually this part still belongs to a) OpenSuSE, for example, does not seem to use (a), but (b). And the officially sounding URL http://www.openal.org/ is also about (b). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
