Hi all, ..first I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to Matthew, for taking his prudent caution, for reluctance to enforce copyright for a wee while, which had me _wonder_, I'm afraid I'm much better at finding 'n sensing vague subtle things quickly, rather than understand them as quickly. ;o)
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:00:03 +1300, James wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..excellent, then you would be in an excellent position to verify > > there indeed _is_ a house [...] I found none and said so. > > > Err, you can see it yourself, at least the roof... if you look on > Google maps, click Map view, type in the address. It will show you > the house section numbered 5A slightly to the left and down from > where Google puts the marker, put your finger on the section, now > click Satellite view, it will show you the house. It's a back > section with a grey roof. ..not the green one? Bordering onto the park, #5A is behind #5 which is the one with the dark grey roof facing the cul-de-sac: http://maps.google.com/maps?num=100&hl=en&q=%225a+Jasmine+place%22+Wigram+%22Christchurch,+Canterbury+8004%22&ie=UTF8&ll=-43.552829,172.539025&spn=0.001819,0.004447&z=19&g=%225a+Jasmine+place%22+Wigram+%22Christchurch,+Canterbury+8004%22&iwloc=addr Zoom in _all_ the way down to see #'s & property border lines. Then check against the eye in the sky: ;o) http://maps.google.com/maps?num=100&hl=en&q=%225a+Jasmine+place%22+Wigram+%22Christchurch,+Canterbury+8004%22&ie=UTF8&g=%225a+Jasmine+place%22+Wigram+%22Christchurch,+Canterbury+8004%22&ll=-43.552829,172.539023&spn=0.003631,0.004866&t=h&z=18&iwloc=addr > Got to love the eye in the sky. ..aye, thank you, looks like I might owe Andrew an apology for suggesting he used a fake address, instead we now have a few new verified addresses. ;o) > > ..respect for who? > > > Well I think it's just rude to post such personal details on public > lists, sure it's available elsewhere I guess (whois) but still, I > don't personally feel comfortable in posting such information. ..I can understand that. ;o) Now tell us all, James, all about: http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg16485.html How did it all work out for you, etc? ;o) > > ..I certainly missed _your_ half of this conversation, > > _did_ you try post this to FG-dev or > > > Eh? You've lost me here. I posted only to FG-dev. ..ok, I didn't see it there before I responded to Matthew's response to you. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
