On mardi 02 décembre 2008, Heiko Schulz wrote: > > The answer is that the flight dynamics is unrealistic, and > > has > > been for years. Redrawing the aircraft won't help much > > (if any). > > -- The lift curve is unrealistic, which explains the > > observations > > that started this thread. > > -- The drag curve is unrealistic, which explains the > > unrealistic > > climb performance and unrealistic short-field landing > > performance. > > -- The effect of flaps on incidence is unrealistic. > > -- The effect of flaps on drag is unrealistic. > > -- The effect of flaps on trim is unrealistic. > > -- The effect of engine power is unrealistic, especially > > the > > interaction between flaps and power. > > -- Et cetera. You get the idea. > > So if you know that all of the fdm is totally unrealistic, so you have real > datas and wanna improve her? > > I'm a little surprised- I always heard that the c172p is one of our most > realistic ones.... > Me too, that is why, when i started the idea about a wrong the lift, i did not trust what i said :)
-- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
