On Wednesday 17 December 2008 22:18:15 I wrote: > Just to make a blunt suggestion, although not completely of my own > imagination: would it be an idea to release this version as 2.0?. > Initially, we wanted to do a 1.9.0 release, because we felt that the OSG > transition wasn't quite there yet. Since then, enormous progress has been > made, in particular in the 3D clouds departments. So given this unexpected > progress, would labeling this release as 2.0 be a viable option? I know > that Curt's been in favor of calling this release 2.0. I initially was a > bit more reluctant, but given the enormous progress, I have to say I'd be > open to the suggestion. >
Okay, of the people who responded, the vote was unanimously against this idea. If it's up to me, I vote for going back to our original consensus, and releasing this version as 1.9.0. As far as I can tell, this number has the majority vote, and although not Curt's preference, he can live with it. To be honest, I personally would also not be too happy with the 2.0 version number yet. Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
