> > I believe that the correct behaviour is as follows: > > > > Decrementing 126.00 results in 126.97 > > Incrementing 126.97results in 126.00 > > Are you sure? I believe the curren behaviour is correct but not for sure > ;-) I check it out within the next few days and drop a line here (probably > not before the weekend). Hi Stuart
I owe you a reply - sorry for keeping you on hold for so long. I have verified that the behaviour you described is correct: wrapping around the kHz does not change the MHz. I tested a KX165 and a KX155. Would you mind posting the intended patch for the kx165, so I can give it a try? Thanks, Torsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
