On 01/28/2009 09:55 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote:

> "bloat" is a hard word for something, which you did not even measure yet. The 
> VIRT column of top is basically useless for getting the memory usage. It's 
> just the virtual address space allocated to that process. That includes:
> * memory allocated with malloc but not yet used, which means that there is no
>    physical RAM used for it
> * mmap'ed files
> * shared memory
> and I'm sure some more which I'm not thinking of.
> 
> According to VIRT, amarok uses > 730MB on my system which is a quite 
> ridiculous number.
> 
> If you're interested in memory usage of a process, a _start_ is the RES 
> column. It's far nearer to the "truth" even though it does not count swap 
> usage of the process. But if FG causes swapping, you don't need top to tell 
> you :) That'd be obvious.

Uhhh, the bloated versions of FG do cause swapping.
And yes, it is plenty obvious.

It's hard to shoot an approach in the up-to-date version 
of FG because if FG is running acrobat is swapped out and
I can't look at the approach plate.  And it's hard to 
cut-and-paste measurements into email because the mailer 
is swapped out.

All indications are that FG is using a high percentage
of its VIRT.

Older versions still run just fine.

Ridiculing the bug report will not make the bug go away.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to