Tim Moore wrote: > If people really don't like the effects syntax, I might be willing to hold my > nose > and use the existing property implementation. I'm also not committed to > having the > effects properties be of class SGPropertyNode; they might be a subtype.
I have two questions after reading this: 1. Will ambient/r, ambient/g and ambient/b still be supported in other locations besides xml embedded effects en techniques? 2. As I see this now this is a way to define custom (not hardcoded) effects. This means only a small number of these configuration files will be created and probably only by developers who know what they are doing. Am I right? If both answers are 'yes' then I see no problem with adding it, otherwise there's still gonna be a bit of discussion I guess. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
