* Tim Moore -- Tuesday 07 April 2009:
> Is it fair to say that you never wanted a discussion, but instead
> wanted to assemble people to yell at me to not make this change?

No, it's not fair! May I remind you that we've had this same
discussion a few times(!) on IRC? You asked me what I think
about additional property types, and I've always made it clear
that I'd object to that and why. This does *not* come as a
surprise. And you knew my arguments.

Even back then you didn't counter any of them IIRC, but rather
concentrated on the "wouldn't-it-be-nice?" aspect. I think I have
the IRC backlog from then, so looking it up shouldn't be be a
problem.

m.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to