Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Martin Spott a écrit :
>> http://foxtrot.mgras.net/bitmap/FGFS/KSFO-861.png
>>
>> Not that, as shown here, not all v8.50 airfields match the quality
>> measures we would expect - just take the northern part of taxiways L
>> (east of 19L) as an example. This doesn't mean that we should not go
>> for v8.50, I'm just trying to point out that we should consider
>> selecting carefully.
>>
>
> Are you sure you have the latest data, or you are not suffering a
> numerical precision problem ? Compare your screenshot with what is
> displayed in the ground radar :
> http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/KSFO-850.png
Ah, thanks for comparing.
My reference airfields look correct, therefore I was under the
impression that the v8.50 KSFO layout is flawed. It doesn't look like a
numerical precision issue but obviously there's a fault at my end.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
