On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Martin Spott wrote: > Therefore I doubt if it's really clever to bend FGRun for this very > case. Nevertheless, my intention was to guide you to a proper fix, if > you don't like it, your choice. At least it would be helpful to try it > out.
Ubuntu issues aside I think it is highly desirable to do this change to fgrun. The --multiplay=in,... argument is only needed when you for some reason need to specify which port to receive on and/or restrict reception to a particular interface. None of those are needed in normal operation when FlightGear connects to a fgms server. AFAIK fgrun has reportedly defaulted to a nonresolvable name on Windows too on several occasions. Let's remove this source of unnecessary confusion from fgrun. Cheers, Anders -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Gidenstam WWW: http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
