On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:48 AM, James Sleeman <flightg...@gogo.co.nz> wrote: > On 28/11/09 13:18, Csaba Halász wrote: >> >> FG -----------> OpenAl ---> ALSA (dmix) ----> hardware >> app1 ----------------> pulse ----^ >> app2 --- ALSA (pulse) ---^ >> > > Also, that's double mixing for pulse applications isn't it? Seems a > fairly bad idea for latency and cpu on everything that goes through > pulse, which is, pretty well everything else except flightgear :-/
Yeah, it would be double mixing. I think the best we can do on the FG side is to try some workarounds, and those are generally not optimal. We are only using OpenAl, so if it has trouble making sound properly then the bug is in OpenAl not FG. I wonder if you can try any other OpenAl application and see if it has the same problem. -- Csaba/Jester ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
