Hi Erik,
Erik Hofman wrote:
> I've never been a fan of pulse audio and will never use it in the
> future. Let's face it, it's like sending OpenGL streams through a
> software renderer before handing it over to the OpenGL hardware.
Yes, let's face it: I've seen quite a lot of different approaches to
"do sound on Linux" passing by over, well, maybe the past one and a
half decade, and none of them managed to cover such a wide range of
"ambitious consumer" use cases like PulseAudio does - even though it's
still in a somewhat early stage of development.
So, to put it in a simplified way, if all the "hardware renderers" are
failing in one or the other way, even after trying for several years,
the "software renderer" might still be a darn good choice as long as it
simply "gets the job done". And it's doing its job better every month.
Cheers,
Martin.
P.S.: No, I'm barely to be called an Ubuntu user ....
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
