Hi,
> Torsten Dreyer a écrit : > > "No transponder" correct, an IFR certified > aircraft without a > > transponder is unrealistic. It's low priority on > my todo list and I > > consider it a missing feature, not a bug. My > goal is to model a > > GTX330 which is what I have in the RL Seneca. As > a side note: I > > consider a transponder "optional". It's one of > the very few items I > > carry on board just for other peoples (ATC) > purpose - next to sick > > bags ;-) > > The transponder isn't often powered in a school glider (who > cares to > take another battery on board when you just plan to > turn around the > field ?) > > But for sure, the first time a glider student has the > chance to fly (high) > in the ATC wisdom, this thing becomes suddenly important. > And well, > how did you say it works ? > > Alexis > I had to smile a bit, when I read about "no transponder" - even we had this in the FGFS c172p- it would be useless, as this is only a dummy. We don't have any real simulating transponder yet- so our ATC-tool can't see our squawks, altitude etc....;-) Our transponder models are just dummies.... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
